Uncovering Hidden Inefficiencies: Value Stream Analysis in IT Projects

-

In the fast-paced world of IT project delivery, teams often chase agility, faster time-to-market, and improved customer satisfaction. But how often do we stop to analyze where our time and resources are actually going? That’s where Value Stream Analysis (VSA) steps in.

Value Stream Analysis offers a lean lens through which we can see not only what gets delivered, but how it gets delivered. By visualizing the end-to-end flow of value, IT organizations can uncover bottlenecks, eliminate waste, and continuously improve.

What Is Value Stream Analysis?

At its core, Value Stream Analysis is the process of mapping the full lifecycle of delivering value — from initial idea to working software in production. It helps us distinguish between:

  • Value-added activities: Steps that directly contribute to the end product and deliver value to the customer.
  • Non-value-added activities: Steps that consume time or resources but do not add customer value (e.g., waiting, rework, manual handoffs).

Why Value Stream Analysis Matters in IT

Software development is a complex web of dependencies: dev teams, testers, security reviews, release managers, cloud provisioning — the list goes on. In this intricate environment, it's easy to mistake activity for progress. VSA helps teams see the bigger picture:

  • Expose delays between development, testing, and deployment.
  • Quantify inefficiencies in handoffs and approvals.
  • Identify rework loops due to unclear requirements or failed deployments.
  • Bridge silos by aligning teams on how value is actually delivered.

How to Conduct a Value Stream Analysis

Here’s a high-level roadmap to conducting a VSA on your next IT project:

1. Identify the Value Stream

Choose a product, service, or workflow to analyze. For example, the process of deploying a new feature to production.

2. Map the Current State

Work with cross-functional teams to visualize every step in the process. Capture key metrics for each:

  • Lead time (total time from request to delivery)
  • Process time (actual time spent doing the work)
  • Wait time
  • Rework or failure rate

Tools like whiteboards, Miro, Lucidchart, or even sticky notes work great for this phase.

3. Analyze for Waste

Look for:

  • Long wait states (e.g., code waiting for QA or approval)
  • Manual, repetitive steps
  • Excessive handoffs or unclear ownership
  • Feedback delays

Use the classic Lean wastes as your guide: waiting, overproduction, handoffs, rework, etc.

4. Design the Future State

Redesign the process with efficiency in mind:

  • Automate testing and deployment
  • Integrate cross-functional teams into agile squads
  • Implement clearer acceptance criteria and definitions of done
  • Reduce batch sizes (small, frequent releases > big-bang launches)

5. Implement and Iterate

Make incremental improvements. Track metrics over time to evaluate impact and refine your value stream.

Real-World Example

Let’s say your IT team delivers features to a customer-facing web app. A VSA reveals:

  • Developers wait 2 days for QA feedback.
  • Code is deployed manually, taking 4 hours with frequent rollback issues.
  • Security scans delay releases by 2 days because they’re not integrated into CI/CD.

After analysis and improvement:

  • Automated tests reduce QA time from 2 days to 30 minutes.
  • CI/CD pipelines with integrated security checks cut deployment from 4 hours to 15 minutes.
  • Lead time drops by 60%.

Final Thoughts

Value Stream Analysis isn’t a one-and-done activity — it’s a mindset. For IT leaders, product owners, and agile coaches, VSA provides the data and visibility needed to prioritize high-impact improvements. In an era where software is eating the world, how you deliver becomes just as important as what you deliver.

Start mapping. You might be surprised at what you find.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SSRS Reports Rotate Text Or Split Alphabet Per Line

-
Image
Few days ago my client requested a report, which required rotation of text and alphabet by 45 degree. Expected output was something Like this: Many of you may know that you can rotate a text in textbox by setting WritingMode to "tb-rl", which will rotate the text and it will look something like this: In order to rotate text at desired angle do following: (1) create an image with desired text (2) rotate that image (3) import it to the image box in report Add System.Drawing to the references by going to the Report Properties -> References. for step1 use following function: Function CreateImage(ByVal sImageText As String, ByVal FontType As String, ByVal FontSize As Integer) As System.Drawing.Bitmap 'Create an image from scratch Dim bmpImage As New Drawing.Bitmap(1, 1) Dim iWidth As Integer = 0 Dim iHeight As Integer = 0 'Create the Font object for the image text drawing. Dim MyFont As New Drawing.Font(FontType, FontSize, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Bold, System.Drawing.G...
Read more

Opinionated Microservices Framework Lagom

-
Lagom is a Swedish word meaning “just the right amount”. Microservices have often been categorised as small services. However, Lightbend wants to emphasize that finding the right boundaries between services, aligning them with bounded contexts, business capabilities, and isolation requirements are the most important aspects when architecting a microservice-based system. Therefore, it fits very well in a Domain-Driven Design focused mindset. Following this will help in building a scalable and resilient system that is easy to deploy and manage. According to Lightbend the focus should not be on how small the services are, but instead they should be just the right size , “Lagom” size services. Lagom, being an opinionated framework, provides a “golden path” from which the developer can deviate if necessary. Being based on the reactive principles as defined in the Reactive Manifesto , Lagom provides the developer a guard-railed approach with good defaults while also allowing to deviate if...
Read more

Recommender systems using MLlib

-
Collaborative filtering is commonly used for recommender systems. These techniques aim to fill in the missing entries of a user-item association matrix. spark.ml currently supports model-based collaborative filtering, in which users and products are described by a small set of latent factors that can be used to predict missing entries. spark.ml uses the alternating least squares (ALS) algorithm to learn these latent factors. The implementation in spark.ml has the following parameters: numBlocks is the number of blocks the users and items will be partitioned into in order to parallelize computation (defaults to 10). rank is the number of latent factors in the model (defaults to 10). maxIter is the maximum number of iterations to run (defaults to 10). regParam specifies the regularization parameter in ALS (defaults to 1.0). implicitPrefs specifies whether to use the explicit feedback ALS variant or one adapted for implicit feedback data (defaults to false...
Read more